Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Darius Florin Pop vs Naoki Tajima Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Pop vs Tajima analysis and find out who is favored!
Darius Florin Pop vs Naoki Tajima Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Pop has won 53.85% of points on his second serve, while Tajima has won 48.12%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Pop, in recent form, has won 47.52% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tajima has won 49.12%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.45% and 38.03% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Pop has saved 44.83% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tajima has saved 59.04% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Pop has won 43.64% of matches played (W/L 24/ 31), with Tajima winning 52.63% (W/L 30/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Pop has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 42% (W/L 23/ 32), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 42% (W/L 10/ 14). Tajima has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 7/ 5), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Pop has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 43.64% of matches (W/L 24/ 31), where as Tajima has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54.72% of matches (W/L 29/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Pop has played against opponents with an average rank of 31.24 while Tajima has played against players with an average rank of 94.89.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Pop has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tajima has won 39% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Pop has converted 44.12% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tajima has converted 47.93% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Pop 0 - 0 Tajima
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
881
Rank
604
High
23
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
42% (33-46)
Career Total W/L
48% (117-128)
52% (13-12)
YTD W/L
50% (13-13)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Darius Florin Pop | Naoki Tajima |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (13/12) | 50% (13/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 48% (27/29) | 54% (33/28) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (286/296) | 53% (299/260) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 45% (5/6) | 56% (10/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 57% (8/6) | 40% (2/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Aces pg | 0.04 | 0.26 |
| Aces Total | 11 | 70 |
| DFs per game | 0.02 | 0.31 |
| DFs Total | 7 | 85 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:23:29 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 78.65 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (197/332) | 58% (762/1310) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (131/197) | 69% (527/762) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 55% (74/135) | 47% (257/548) |
| BPs Won% Total | 52% (14/27) | 47% (73/155) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (145/366) | 44% (603/1385) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Futures W/L | 52% (13/12) | 54% (13/11) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (13/25) | 52% (12/23) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 50% (2/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 83% (5/6) | 25% (2/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (13/12) | 80% (15/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (13/1) | 20% (15/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 8% (12/1) | 9% (11/1) |
Darius Florin Pop Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats 
Mika Brunold
Player
Darius Florin Pop
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
49%
(
34 of
69)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Darius Florin Pop
Player
Koray Kirci
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(8) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Darius Florin Pop
Player
Kaya Arinc
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
63%
(
53 of
84)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
9
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
28 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
84)
83
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 6-7(2) 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Darius Florin Pop
Player
Cengiz Aksu
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve %
78%
(
46 of
59)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
8 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Geni Inoue
Player
Darius Florin Pop
80%
(
56 of
70)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 3-6 6-2 10-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Naoki Tajima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Kanan Gasimov
Player
Naoki Tajima
58%
(
14 of
24)
1st Serve %
38%
(
6 of
16)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
9 of
14)
1st Serve Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
9 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
75%
(
12 of
16)
27
Total Points Won
13
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrin Casanova
Player
Naoki Tajima
53%
(
48 of
90)
1st Serve %
61%
(
53 of
87)
9
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
37%
(
33 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
95
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naoki Tajima
Player
Mubarak Shannan Zayid
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Naoki Tajima
67%
(
61 of
91)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
8
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
98
Total Points Won
71
|
6-1 6-7(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naoki Tajima
Player
Fedor Sosedkin
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
7
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
13 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daisuke Sumizawa
Player
Naoki Tajima
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
57
|
4-6 6-1 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 1-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesse Delaney
Player
Naoki Tajima
72%
(
68 of
94)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
9
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
6
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
44 of
54)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
33 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sam Oster
Player
Naoki Tajima
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
10
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
46%
(
33 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
66
|
3-6 6-3 10-6 | H2H | ||
view more
Pop Vs Tajima Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
